![]() One issue I did not expect is ejector swipes on every single piece of brass, both the LC XM80 break-in rounds and my tame reloads, to exactly the same degree. 308s, so I don't know if that kind of performance is common place, right from the get-go or not? For those of you who have the 20 round Polymer mags, does it offer any greater COL capacity without modding? I expected the FAL magazine to allow COLs beyond 2.80, but that's about all you can get in there, without removing the shim in the rear of the MAG. My only regret came from my own misunderstanding of the Shooting Times article that led me to purchase it. Either it likes the CCI 200 / AR-Comp combo, the velocity they produced, or both. I was mildly pleased with the results given they were from a new, Hbar profiled barrel, as opposed to a varmint or bull. At this point in time, I have no desire to look any further than my LAR-8. Since the magazines appear to be an issue of the past, the LAR-8 is a viable option. It's rarely an accuracy or reliability problem. ![]() The only consistent complaint you hear about the LAR-8 is magazines. I have also heard the Thermold/RRA polymer mags are working excellent and they are around $20 US. The only magazine I currently have is the rebuilt surplus mag that RRA supplies with the rifle. ![]() It shoots them all very well and I've never had a FTF/FTE or any other issues with the bolt holding open. I have shot a few hundred rounds of factory ammo from 150gr Federal Power-Shok to 168gr Federal GMM. Anybody have any input on these as compared to the DPMS or Armalite variants? I like the LAR-8 because it accepts the FAL magazines which can save me some cash. I'd like something more "old school" such as the M1A or the FAL, however these don't accept optics as well. 308 battle rifle that is reliable and can easily accept optics (ACOG). Originally Posted By: ogurumaI am looking for a.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |